Search for: All records

BackgroundSemantic intrusion errors (SIEs) are associated with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) due to Alzheimer's disease (AD). It is unknown whether accounting for maximum learning capacity still leads to an increase in SIEs when elevated plasma p-tau₂₁₇, a biological indicator of underlying AD, is present. MethodsOne hundred fifty-eight older adult participants completed the Loewenstein-Acevedo Scales for Semantic Interference and Learning (LASSI-L), a sensitive cognitive challenge test designed to elicit SIEs. Of these, 108 were clinically diagnosed with amnestic MCI (aMCI). Fifty-eight individuals met or exceeded a plasma p-tau₂₁₇positivity of >0.55 pg/ml, while 50 individuals scored below this threshold. ResultsAfter adjusting for demographic covariates and maximum learning capacity, the aMCI p-tau₂₁₇+ group evidenced more SIEs compared to aMCI p-tau₂₁₇- on the first (list B1;p= 0.035) and second trials of the competing list (list B2;p= 0.006). Biological predictors such asApoEε4 status, higher p-tau₂₁₇, and older age were predictors of an elevated number of SIEs [list B2:F(3,104) = 10.92;p= 0.001;R= 0.489)]. ConclusionsUnlike previous studies that used amyloid PET or other plasma biomarkers, individuals with aMCI p-tau₂₁₇+ evidenced more SIEs, even after adjusting for their initial learning capacity, a covariate that has not been studied previously. These findings support that SIEs are more prevalent in the presence of underlying AD pathology and occur independent of learning deficits. 

Neuroimaging and biofluid biomarkers provide a proxy of pathological changes for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and are useful in improving diagnosis and assessing disease progression. However, it is not clear how race/ethnicity and different prevalence of AD risks impact biomarker levels. In this narrative review, we survey studies focusing on comparing biomarker differences between non-Hispanic White American(s) (NHW), African American(s) (AA), Hispanic/Latino American(s) (HLA), and Asian American(s) with normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia. We found no strong evidence of racial and ethnic differences in imaging biomarkers after controlling for cognitive status and cardiovascular risks. For biofluid biomarkers, in AA, higher levels of plasma Aβ42/Aβ40, and lower levels of CSF total tau and p-tau 181, were observed after controlling for APOE status and comorbidities compared to NHW. Examining the impact of AD risks and comorbidities on biomarkers and their contributions to racial/ethnic differences in cognitive impairment are critical to interpreting biomarkers, understanding their generalizability, and eliminating racial/ethnic health disparities. 

IntroductionThis study investigated the role of proactive semantic interference (frPSI) in predicting the progression of amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment (aMCI) to dementia, taking into account various cognitive and biological factors. MethodsThe research involved 89 older adults with aMCI who underwent baseline assessments, including amyloid PET and MRI scans, and were followed longitudinally over a period ranging from 12 to 55 months (average 26.05 months). ResultsThe findings revealed that more than 30% of the participants diagnosed with aMCI progressed to dementia during the observation period. Using Cox Proportional Hazards modeling and adjusting for demographic factors, global cognitive function, hippocampal volume, and amyloid positivity, two distinct aspects of frPSI were identified as significant predictors of a faster decline to dementia. These aspects were fewer correct responses on a frPSI trial and a higher number of semantic intrusion errors on the same trial, with 29.5% and 31.6 % increases in the likelihood of more rapid progression to dementia, respectively. DiscussionThese findings after adjustment for demographic and biological markers of Alzheimer’s Disease, suggest that assessing frPSI may offer valuable insights into the risk of dementia progression in individuals with aMCI. 

Objective: The interaction of ethnicity, progression of cognitive impairment, and neuroimaging biomarkers of Alzheimer’s Disease remains unclear. We investigated the stability in cognitive status classification (cognitively normal [CN] and mild cognitive impairment [MCI]) of 209 participants (124 Hispanics/Latinos and 85 European Americans). Methods: Biomarkers (structural MRI and amyloid PET scans) were compared between Hispanic/Latino and European American individuals who presented a change in cognitive diagnosis during the second or third follow-up and those who remained stable over time. Results: There were no significant differences in biomarkers between ethnic groups in any of the diagnostic categories. The frequency of CN and MCI participants who were progressors (progressed to a more severe cognitive diagnosis at follow-up) and non-progressors (either stable through follow-ups or unstable [progressed but later reverted to a diagnosis of CN]) did not significantly differ across ethnic groups. Progressors had greater atrophy in the hippocampus (HP) and entorhinal cortex (ERC) at baseline compared to unstable non-progressors (reverters) for both ethnic groups, and more significant ERC atrophy was observed among progressors of the Hispanic/Latino group. For European Americans diagnosed with MCI, there were 60% more progressors than reverters (reverted from MCI to CN), while among Hispanics/Latinos with MCI, there were 7% more reverters than progressors. Binomial logistic regressions predicting progression, including brain biomarkers, MMSE, and ethnicity, demonstrated that only MMSE was a predictor for CN participants at baseline. However, for MCI participants at baseline, HP atrophy, ERC atrophy, and MMSE predicted progression. 

Abstract Alzheimer's disease is the leading cause of dementia. The long progression period in Alzheimer's disease provides a possibility for patients to get early treatment by having routine screenings. However, current clinical diagnostic imaging tools do not meet the specific requirements for screening procedures due to high cost and limited availability. In this work, we took the initiative to evaluate the retina, especially the retinal vasculature, as an alternative for conducting screenings for dementia patients caused by Alzheimer's disease. Highly modular machine learning techniques were employed throughout the whole pipeline. Utilizing data from the UK Biobank, the pipeline achieved an average classification accuracy of 82.44%. Besides the high classification accuracy, we also added a saliency analysis to strengthen this pipeline's interpretability. The saliency analysis indicated that within retinal images, small vessels carry more information for diagnosing Alzheimer's diseases, which aligns with related studies.